Love it or hate it modern art is here to stay. Only this morning I saw a picture in the newspaper which shows a group of Olympic village workers sitting on a nearby riverside dressed in their work gear with their high visibility jackets, hard hats and sandwiches wrapped in tin foil, overlooking the water they survey all that is around them. The title of the piece is called Freeze Frame and on first glance it looks like just a bunch of guys sitting by the river and you ask yourself how on earth is this possibly called “art” However, when you look at it in closer detail you then realise it is in actual fact a modern day take on an original masterpiece created by a French post-impressionist painter called Georges Seurat who’s real title is Bathers At Asnieres painted in 1884

Then you have another example that I saw on the TV a few years ago. Whilst idly flicking through the channels one night I came across a documentary style program of an artist in his workshop. It had all the hallmarks of the classic man at work in his studio with splattering’s of paint here and there, brushes in jars half filled with water, a few pieces stacked up against one wall, skylight windows and a cup of cold tea on a table. He was master of his domain, king of the studio, his work was…..well, a piece of art!

It wasn’t the fact that here was a man at work, it was more to do with the piece that he made and I’ll try to explain it here…Imagine if you can a rectangular wooden frame around 3 metres by 2 metres covered in a white canvas which is stretched tight and stapled to the frame. Next, take a pot of red paint and heavily cover the whole of the canvas. Whilst the paint is still wet, take a suitable object to scrape off the excess top layer and leave the remainder to dry. Et voila, there you have it! The whole process took him no more than a couple of hours from start to finish, cost him a minimal amount in materials and was then sold for a whopping £900!!!!!!!!! Someone once said that people would stick tenner’s up their bums if they thought it was fashionable and I think that the same goes for life in the art world too. Give something a fancy name, make up a load of nondescript info and call it “artistic”.

Now for me, the mother of all philistines’ art is something that you can view to understand a story or depiction. John Constables Haywain, Whistlers Mother, Van Gough’s Sunflowers or even probably the most famous of them all, Da Vinci’s The Last Supper. I’ll even stretch and twist my mind a little to viewing Picasso but I find it completely and utterly mind bogglingly dull to appreciate most forms of “Modern Art”. Can anybody explain to me how Dolly the sheep, Tracy Emin’s messed up bed or lights being turned on and off in a blank white room depict art? It is said to be in the mind of the beholder and their interpretation of what they see. Well, I see a messed up bed every morning when I get up, I turn on the light to walk into the kitchen then turn it back off again, and as for the sheep… well we’ll leave that one there…

In my line of work I occasionally get a person of an artistic nature requesting me to help them with their vision, their dream. However, sadly, all they can see is the end concept and that’s it! It then becomes my job to help work out the technicalities and the practical implications of whether their design is achievable or not. In some cases it can be done, in others it can’t and when you tell someone that what they want is not possible, verging on the impossible – let alone silly, they tend to get a little upset and blame you for ruining their work, their concept and sometimes, their whole life. The mind of an artist I’ve noticed is usually narrow when it comes to their work and to ask them for, dare I mention it, “the bigger picture” can equate to that of asking a snowman to hang around on the beach in the mid July sunshine – possible if you have a fridge nearby but usually unlikely to happen.

But what about when modern art goes wrong? In 2011 the Tate Modern gallery in London accepted a piece called “The walking boat” by Andrew Baldwin  http://www.walkingboat.com/  this 40ft boat was due to travel up the river Thames in London, stop outside the gallery, turn and then quite literally “walk” up the shore line to the edge of the building. From an engineering perspective that must have been pretty awesome to see had it have worked. Two years manufacturing and whatever money was spent in creating this huge metal beast failed right at the final hurdle. Majestically the boat sailed up the Thames, stopped, turned and… sunk into the mud due to the sheer weight of the entire boat! If ever there was a good time for a Homer Simpson Doh! That was it.

This is a subject that could, like most artists, go on and on. An artist usually only becomes famous when they are dead anyway so what’s the point in that? The art world is in my opinion quite a strange one – secluded from the outside world and reality. They are wrapped up in their own little bubble continually repeating their same old and tired record of how the viewer can engage, visualise, feel and remonstrate with the piece. If you took a mug tree from out of your kitchen and placed it in a gallery you would be told that the vertical stem represents strength, the arms are reaching out in an ever splendid pose, as though longing and searching for their nearest mate. The cups that hang from it will represent glowing colourful containers helping to provide heated springs of life in the form of the organic plant to the ever living soul and the round base will be the platform of stability, never ending, never beginning.

To you and me however, it’s just a mug tree! Find me two artists that agree with one another and I’ll find you a liar.

Wingwalker.